What is a potential drawback of using adult interviews for screening?

What is a potential drawback of using adult interviews for screening?

• A. They are longer than self-reporting measures
• B. They are not used for infants
• C. They require more time than self-reporting measures
• D. They are shorter than self-reporting measures

Answer: (C)

The main idea is that interviews with adults for screening take more time to administer and process than self-report measures. Conducting an interview requires scheduling, a trained interviewer, one-on-one interaction, and often transcription or detailed note-taking, which adds to the duration and the resources needed for each screening. Self-report questionnaires, by contrast, are typically quick, standardized, and can be completed by caregivers or teachers in a short amount of time and scored automatically. Because of these differences, adult interviews are more time-intensive and resource-demanding, making them a less efficient option when screening large groups or when time and staffing are limited.

The main idea is that interviews with adults for screening take more time to administer and process than self-report measures. Conducting an interview requires scheduling, a trained interviewer, one-on-one interaction, and often transcription or detailed note-taking, which adds to the duration and the resources needed for each screening. Self-report questionnaires, by contrast, are typically quick, standardized, and can be completed by caregivers or teachers in a short amount of time and scored automatically. Because of these differences, adult interviews are more time-intensive and resource-demanding, making them a less efficient option when screening large groups or when time and staffing are limited.